Saturday, January 18, 2014

An Agent of God II

In the last post, we considered the comment, "It’s a scary thing that you think you are God’s agent…thus everything you do is right and God’s will."  To which my response was "No it isn’t…not for you to whom I come, though it might bode ill for me since I am working without a net." 

Some of what follows might be review, but here are five things that I have learned and some quotes from what I have read…

1)    Agents of God are ministers of reconciliation, not power.
I made this point in my last post but wanted to re-visit it with this quote,
Our witness is not made from a posture of authority or arrogance but from a posture of humility and weakness. Paul said in [2 Cor. 2:3], "I was with you in weakness and fear and much trembling." If we try to come to folks simply from a posture of being authoritative or arrogant—if we try to beat people over the head with the Bible—all we do is drive them away. God has given us the rare privilege of handling holy things. We do that with fear, trembling, and much humility.[1]

2)    Agents of God are coming to serve rather than be served.
While we have come to serve, we need to take time to listen or our help may end up being a curse instead of a blessing as Niebuhr observes,
The breakdown of our society due to human sinfulness has robbed people of safe places (e.g., marriage, family, and church). Even our sincere efforts at fixing what is broken often just make things worse if we haven’t taken time to listen to the Lord and to those in need. Yet, we need safe places where we can heal together—places where we mutually pity the stranger, enter into their story and find new family in the process.[2]

3)    Agents of God are invitational, not coercive.
Soong-Chan Rah, in his book, Many Colors: Cultural Intelligence for a Changing Church, repeatedly advocates for us to listen to each other’s story, and to “discover the hidden or untold story.”[3] But listening takes time so we Americans simply press forward with the plans we feel are the most effective. We think we know better than “others” and feel justified in not listening. This tyranny of action that historically has permeated our culture has also been mixed with a heavy dose of the end justifying the means. The church is not immune to such cultural pulls.
Worldliness can also infect a church's methods. In a day of shifting paradigms with many innovative ways of thinking and doing, many church leaders assume any method that is new or produces visible results is acceptable to God. A not-so-holy pragmatism sometimes makes us believe any means justifies the end when the means and the end often need to be reevaluated in light of the New Testament. Although worldliness may not be in the method, it can be in the attitude of those who use the method.[4]

4)    Agents of God desire to follow Jesus’ example of incarnational care not merely to offer aid from a safe distance via drones, remote control, or robotic arms.
"The calling of the church is to embody, but not compel, this vision."[5] As we desire to embody, to model a different way of living, to help those in the most poverty-stricken areas Perkins says that we need to be willing to relocate or “move into a needy community so that its needs become our own needs.”[6] And as
Another way of restoring the stabilizing glue to our urban areas is for committed Christians to live in these communities. The importance of our physical presence in these communities can’t be overstated, whether it means moving to them for the first time, coming back, or just staying put. This principle that we have come to call relocation is what has given Christian community development success as well as undeniable credibility.[7]

5)    Agents of God see the church as an intentional community of peace, not a voluntary social club established to maintain the status quo.
I frequently hear people, from many backgrounds and in diverse contexts, complain about personal betrayals, physical and emotional abuses, terrible crimes in the community, and even corporate injustice and government heavy-handedness. We need our homes, our towns, counties, states, and countries to be not only safe but just. The problem we face is that in wanting to help make things better our government programs simply make things worse. Why? Because even our highest ideals apart from the redeeming love of Christ are tainted by pride and ego endemic since that first selfish act in a garden long ago.
“A second consequence of the root sin is the social sinfulness of mankind… Friendship is corrupted by treachery; the home, ‘natural refuge from the ills of life,’ is itself not safe; the political order in city and empire is not only confused by wars and oppressions, but the very administration of justice becomes a perverse business in which ignorance seeking to check vice commits new injustice.”[8] [emphasis mine]

From housing projects to health care reform, we can see how efforts to help can easily turn bad. Efforts to legislate morality to protect social justice have failed just as badly. What is needed is not a new deal but a new heart, not a program but a personal relationship with the Savior. When we have that, when we follow Jesus’ incarnational example, we continue to die to our own sense of entitlement and need for control and live life in a way that is helpful and liberating—truly humanizing—to those around us. Our Triune God cares about the sick, and the poor, and justice for the oppressed. If we are agents of God we will be a profound blessing to our communities because we will stand for mercy, truth, and sacrificial serving love. I have a ways to go, yet I remain hopeful.

I will conclude with the words of John Perkins, “I believe that the church has the opportunity to pioneer and model a way of life whereby our nation itself can experience a new birth.”[9]



[1] John E. Mathison, "A First Century Witness for a 21st Century World." Preaching, (March 2013): 34-37.
[2] H. Richard Niebuhr, Christ & Culture. [New York: HarperOne, 1951], 212.
[3] Soong-Chan Rah, Many Colors: Cultural Intelligence for a Changing Church (Chicago: Moody Publishers, 2010), 132-156.
[4] Niebuhr, 211.
[5] Colin E. Gunton, The Promise of Trinitarian Theology (New York: T & T Clark, 1997), 177.
[6] John Perkins. Beyond Charity: The Call to Christian Community Development, Baker Publishing Group. Kindle Edition, 36.
[7] Perkins, 75.
[8] Niebuhr, 212.
[9] Perkins, 18.

No comments:

Post a Comment